My stepfather didn’t make adequate provision for me in his will.” Which case won?
A case heard in NSW involved a dispute over whether a man had made adequate provision for his stepdaughter in his will.
The man died in November 2017.
The gross value of his estate at the date of his death was about $205,000.
He and his first wife had two children together, who resided in the United Kingdom.
The man met his second wife in Australia in 1984, and they married in 1986.
They had no children together. However, the man’s second wife had one child, who became his stepdaughter.
The second wife died in 2015, leaving her entire estate to her husband, save for a silver belt which she left to her daughter.
In 2012, the man had made a will in which his stepdaughter was named as a substitute beneficiary in the event of her mother dying before him.
However, in 2016 he made a new will, in which he left nothing to his stepdaughter. Instead he left the whole of his estate to his biological children and grandchildren.
After payment of debts and funeral and testamentary expenses, each of his children was to receive 40 per cent of his estate, his granddaughter ten per cent, and his grandsons who were living at the date of his death the remaining ten per cent divided between them.
It’s not over till it’s over – fighting off a winding up order under section 482
How to use the law to recover a business debt
“The vendors only want to rescind the contract because the property’s value increased.” Which case won?
A dispute heard in NSW was between the buyer of a property and its vendors, who wanted to rescind the contract of sale after the sunset date had passed.
The parties entered into a conveyancing transaction for off-the-plan (unregistered) residential land in Picton, NSW.
The vendors were husband and wife. The wife signed the contract of sale on behalf of her husband. The purchaser signed the counterpart contract and the contracts were exchanged on 2 July 2015.
The contract contained several special conditions, one of which was that the plan of subdivision had to be registered within six months of the date of the contract (commonly referred to as a “sunset date”).
If the vendor did everything reasonably necessary to register the plan of subdivision but failed to do so within this time, it would enable either party to rescind – that is, terminate the contract.
Renting out your spare bedroom? Spell out the terms
Impact on photography of new laws on “serious invasions of privacy”
Cryptocurrency the new battleground in divorce property settlements
Trans athlete wins battle for APVO following online abuse by cyberbully
Landmark $2.4m silicosis award for tunnel worker
Move to increase psychological injury threshold in NSW workers comp bill defeated
“I comforted him and then I watched him die.” Was the driver to blame for the police officer’s PTSD? Which case won?
A Queensland police officer developed PTSD after attending a motor vehicle accident in 2013, involving a car driver who was speeding and intoxicated with amphetamines and cannabis at the time of the collision.
The policeman attended the scene and tried to keep the driver alive with first aid and encouragement. He was the first officer on the scene, having arrived earlier than the ambulance paramedics and the fire brigade.
The police officer had to deal with the arrival of the driver’s parents at the scene of the accident and had to indicate to them that their son would not survive. The driver’s parents had to say goodbye to him at the accident scene.
The fact of having to deal with the driver’s parents added an extra level of trauma for the policeman, over and above the trauma of dealing with the driver’s injuries, which proved to be fatal.
In NSW personal injury law, Maurie Stack was ‘the equivalent of Pele or Beyonce’
Law tightens on Botox, no-one looks surprised
‘Giant of the Law’: legal profession mourns passing of Maurie Stack OAM
“The tenant abandoned the premises owing us over a million in lease incentives.” Which case won?
A law firm negotiated with a landlord for the lease of office premises in the inner Brisbane suburb of Bowen Hills, in Queensland. In November 2010, the parties agreed a deal and the terms were recorded in two documents:
- A standard form lease for a term of seven years, with three options to renew. Rent was to be paid monthly and a signage fee was to be paid annually; and
- An incentive deed, by which the landlord offered several incentives to the law firm to secure the deal, including a contribution to the fitout of the offices and a three-year reduction in the rent and signage fees payable under the lease.
Promissory estoppel: “One day all this will be yours…” – which case won?
A married couple bought a rural property on the northwest peri-urban fringe of Sydney in 1969. Both held high-profile jobs in fields unrelated to agriculture, so for the whole of the time between the purchase and the death in 2016 of the wife, who outlived her husband, the property had to be run by a manager on a share farming basis.
The claimant was the son of the man who had managed the property until 1974, after which the claimant, then 22, took over, and remained as the manager until the death of the wife.
Under the will of the wife – the sole owner of the property after her husband’s death – the property was left to one of her two daughters; and there was a gift of a little over $200,000 to the claimant.
Construction site accidents and injured workers
“My daughter should attend a public school, not a Christian school. My secular values are just as valid.” Which case won?
A couple had a child in 2008 and separated in 2010. The parents had distinctly different world views, with the mother being deeply religious, while the father was not religious at all. After the separation, the couple managed to negotiate arrangements for sharing the care of the child.
In November 2012 the father took legal action against the mother, seeking interim orders binding the parties in relation to the school that their daughter would attend.