Exposure to toxic chemicals increases cancer risk for firefighters
Did the old man have the mental capacity to change his will? Which case won?
A case heard in the Supreme Court of NSW in 2017 concerned whether or not an old man had the mental capacity to change his will.
In 2011, the man signed a will which gave his estate to his three children equally. The will instructions were taken by his long-term solicitor. The man was aged 87 at the time.
In 2013 the man signed a new will, which gave his estate to his three children and his de facto spouse equally. Again, the will instructions were taken by his long-term solicitor. The man was aged 89 by this time.
Photography, privacy and copyright infringement
“I suffered catastrophic complications because a negligent neurosurgeon gave me bad advice.” Which case won?
The patient was a 73-year-old man who was happy, fit and active. In early 2011, he began to experience headaches and consulted his GP for treatment.
After performing various diagnostic investigations which were found to be inconclusive, the man’s GP referred him to a neurosurgeon.
The man consulted the neurosurgeon, who identified on a CT scan that the man had a benign brain tumour. The surgeon took the view that the tumour could be removed endoscopically, without the need to open up the patient’s skull. The surgeon said that this surgery would enable him to remove the tumour through the patient’s nose.
“I was only injured because of the company’s negligence.” Which case won?
A case in 2018 concerned the question of whether a contractor’s injuries were caused by negligence of the company where he worked.
A light vehicle mechanic employed by a service company was working as an independent contractor at a landscaping and garden supply company, servicing bulldozers, excavators, forklifts, trucks and wheel loaders across their 15 work sites.
In early 2007, the mechanic was directed to service a Volvo wheel loader that was owned and operated by the landscaping company. The machine had been damaged and the mechanic was unable to realign and fasten the bolts of the “bash plate” on one side. As a short-term solution, the bash plate was welded on, so that the loader could be put back into operation quickly.
Later in 2007 the mechanic was again directed to service the wheel loader. While he was attempting to remove the bash plate, which weighed approximately 200 kilograms, it fell onto the ground, crushing his right arm.
Did the police have a reasonable suspicion to conduct a strip search? Was the evidence inadmissible? Which case won?
A case in 2017 revolved around the question of whether the police had “reasonable suspicion” to conduct a strip search.
A man was riding a motorcycle along a road when he was stopped by police for not having his helmet strap done up. The man appeared to be nervous.
The police officer made enquiries and found out that the man had previous charges of drug possession and was on bail for manufacturing a prohibited drug. The police officer also observed “ice sores” on the man’s face.
Accordingly, the police officer formed the view that the motorcyclist might be in possession of drugs and decided to search him. In searching the man, the police officer conducted a frisk search and also put his hand inside the man’s jeans and into his genital area.
The man resisted and said: “You can’t do that”. He was then handcuffed and a strip search was performed. The strip search was conducted in public on the roadside in front of other officers.
A plastic bag containing methamphetamine was found in the man’s genital area.
Changes coming to NSW workers compensation for psychological injuries
“How can a head office make its franchisees sell pizza at a loss? Surely that’s unconscionable.” Which case won?
A case heard in the Federal Court in 2016 concerned an allegation by franchisees of a pizza chain of unconscionable conduct on the part of the franchisor.
In 2014, the franchisor of the Pizza Hut system in Australia devised a new “value strategy”, first to reduce the number of pizza ranges on offer from four to two; and secondly, to reduce the price of one range from $9.95 to $4.95 and the other from $11.95 to $8.50.
The strategy was devised in the wake of similar measures introduced by rival pizza chain Dominos, and on the back of several years of declining sales at Pizza Hut.
The franchisor undertook some testing of the value strategy in the ACT market, with promising results, and determined to implement the strategy Australia-wide.
Franchisees were required to adopt the strategy because the franchise agreements they had signed gave the franchisor the discretion to change the product range at their outlets and to set maximum prices.
How not to have a mortgagee sale
Can a vendor cancel a contract of sale and keep the deposit? Which case won?
A dispute heard in the NSW Court of Appeal concerned whether or not a property vendor was entitled to cancel a contract of sale and keep the purchaser’s deposit.
A parcel of land in Fairfield, Sydney, was sold at auction for $1.46 million. The buyer and seller entered into a contract for sale and the buyer paid a ten per cent deposit of $146,000. The contract stated that the completion date was to be 20 June 2015.
Some time prior to entering into the contract, the vendor had performed earthworks on the property. The local council had declared the earthworks illegal and issued an order requiring that the seller reinstate the property to its previous condition.
By a special condition contained in the contract, the seller agreed to reinstate the property as required by the order “before completion”. The contract stated that the buyer would be entitled to terminate the contract and be repaid the deposit if the seller failed to do so.
“I deserve more of the marital assets because I bought the house and now I look after the children.” Which case won?
A case in the Family Court involved a dispute over the division of marital assets.
The husband was aged 39, the wife was aged 37 and they had been married for about ten years at the time of separating. They had two children.
When they started living together, the husband had assets of a total value of $226,000, while the wife had assets of a total value of $11,500.
The husband was employed at all times and the wife was employed until shortly before the first child was born, then employed part-time after the first child turned five.
Court finds school’s duty of care extends beyond school gate
Speed camera operator awarded $401K for assault and battery in vigilante attack
Institutions can be vicariously liable for sexual abuse
Farm injuries show safety must be taken seriously
Strata owners corporation convicted over site death
Who was to blame for a drunken motorcycle accident? Which case won?
A case heard in NSW in 2017 involved a drunken motorcycle accident.
At 5.15 in the morning following a night of heavy drinking, two men who were friends each rode an unregistered off-road motorcycle (trail bike) on a public road in New South Wales. The two men subsequently become the plaintiff and defendant in this case.
Neither motorcycle was fitted with a headlight. While travelling in opposite directions along the road, the two trail bikes were involved in what was effectively a head-on collision.
The collision occurred on the plaintiff’s side of the road, about 1.5 metres from the centre line on the road. The bikes both collided on their left-hand side, which meant the defendant’s motorbike had to have crossed the path of the plaintiff’s bike before they collided.
The plaintiff was wearing a motorcycle helmet, but the defendant was not. While the plaintiff was unlicensed, he did have considerable experience riding trail bikes.