Tax office claims fraud after company transfers land following large tax assessment – which case won?
Following a tax assessment, the corporate trustee of a family trust was found to owe $7 million to the Australian Taxation Office.
The company held nine properties for the trust. After receiving the tax bill, the company implemented a complicated restructure to transfer ownership of those properties.
Yes, you can speak ill of the dead
Misleading or deceptive conduct, trademark infringement, or just clever business strategy? Which case won?
Upon having a hair treatment at an Israeli hairdressing salon, a Canadian tourist liked the treatment so much that she purchased all the salon’s bottles and started distributing the product in North America.
She later acquired the worldwide rights to the product, and in October 2007 set up a new company selling its range of hair care products in several countries.
The company launched its products in Australia in September 2009.
These products were part of a “salon-only professional high-end prestige brand”, and the principal ingredient was argan oil.
Climate change protests provoke debate on right to protest in Australia
Was the email defamatory? Which case won?
The chairperson of the strata committee and the tenant lived in the same strata building. The tenant had recently moved into the complex and did not always lock her letterbox.
There was an increase of mailbox theft in the area and the chairperson was of the view that if all residents were to lock their letterboxes, it would reduce the chance of theft of mail.