Can I become bankrupt to get rid of my debts?
Little known NSW Road Rule 198 could cost you hundreds
Cartel conduct in waste disposal industry ends in criminal convictions
What is the new right to disconnect?
Who is liable when art forgery is uncovered – the auction house, the seller, or the buyer’s agent? Which case won?
An art investor engaged an art expert to act as her agent. The agent’s role was to locate valuable but underpriced works of art and bid on the investor’s behalf at various auctions for the sale of artwork, including paintings and sculptures.
Around that time the seller engaged an auction house to advertise and subsequently sell a painting by a famous Australian artist at a public auction. In doing so the seller and the auction house entered into a contract.
By way of that contract, the seller of the painting made a number of promises to the auctioneer, including that the painting was painted by a specific famous artist, specifying the year it was painted, that the auction house was allowed to advertise the painting as having been painted by that artist and that no third party had expressed concerns about the authenticity of the painting.
Relying on the contract, the auctioneer published a catalogue, inspected by the buyer of the painting, which stated there was “no doubt” that the painting was authentic. None of the parties had any reason to suspect the painting was a forgery at the time of its sale.
The sale went ahead and the buyer purchased the artwork for the princely sum of $85,000.
Could an employment restraint stop a former employee from setting up a competing business? Which case won?
A case heard in the Supreme Court of NSW in 2017 concerned an employment restraint in a worker’s employment contract.
The company in question manufactured and sold school uniforms in NSW. The employee had worked in that industry for many years before she joined the company in July 2015.
Her employment contract with the company included a “restraint of trade” clause, preventing her, in the event she left her employment at the company, from starting up her own business in competition with the company for a period of either three or six months.
The employment contract also contained a clause requiring her to refrain from misusing or disclosing confidential information of the company, either before or after termination of her employment.
Misfeasance in public office and the robodebt debacle
Beware the non-disparagement clause
Companies warned of need for market disclosure following cyber attack
Crackdown on social media influencers who fail to disclose payments
Heavy penalties for cartel conduct by roofing companies in NSW
Bad short-term renters and hosts in NSW can now go on Exclusion Register
“My mother agreed to us buying a house together, but now she wants her money back.” Which case won?
A mother, daughter and son-in-law lived together in a house they rented in town.
However, they all agreed that in order for the daughter and son-in-law to provide accommodation and care properly for the mother, they would need a larger house.
To achieve this objective, they signed a deed of family arrangement.
Could a man abstain from voting because it went against his personal religion of “freedom”? Which case won?
A registered voter failed to attend a polling booth to vote in the 2016 federal election. He was subsequently issued with a penalty notice by the Australian Electoral Commission, inviting him to pay a fine or give reasons why he failed to vote.
Under the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918, voting is compulsory in Australia unless an elector has a “valid and sufficient reason” for failing to do so.
How do you make a small claim in NSW?
Was the police officer’s PTSD a total and permanent disability or was the insurer right to reject her claim? Which case won?
A police officer worked for NSW Police and was involved in a number of traumatic events before ultimately quitting the police force.
After leaving the force, the officer was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression. Owing to her illness, the officer did not return to any kind of employment.