Illegal building works – the horror story edition
Trouble at the bank of mum and dad – the horror story edition on family loans
“The council should have told me about the stormwater pipe that floods my property before I bought it.” Which case won?
A Sydney property was bought in 1989. The buyer was unaware of a stormwater pipe that ran under the property.
The pipe was owned by the local council and had been in existence since about 1904. It had significantly deteriorated over time and had become blocked.
During heavy rainfall, the pipe was no longer effective to drain stormwater from the street. The backed-up water would pool until it inundated the property.
Checklist for real estate agents – dealing with a lawyer or conveyancer on a residential property sale in NSW
Who has to pay for repairs? The landlord or the tenant?
Release of deposit clause in property sale contracts
“I paid the deposit on time and the vendors have to complete the property sale.” Which case won?
On 4 April 2019, a purchaser and vendors exchanged contracts for the sale of a residential property in Vaucluse, Sydney. The purchase price was $4,830,000 with a 5% deposit.
Special condition 38 of the contract provided that the deposit was payable in two instalments.
The first instalment of $150,000 was payable on exchange, while the second instalment of $91,500 was payable “on the 4th month after the contract date”.
How to contest a Power of Attorney or Enduring Guardian in NSW
Revoking a Power of Attorney or Enduring Guardian in NSW
How do you choose an executor for your will? – the horror story edition
Power of Attorney and Enduring Guardianship – the horror story edition
Could the daughter evict her parents, or had she made a contractual promise that they could live in her house for life? Which case won?
A husband and wife acquired a property in 1975.
The husband, a builder, built the family home on the property. He and his wife raised their five daughters there.
Subsequently, the husband and wife borrowed money to fund improvements to the family home.
In 2012 the husband developed a heart condition and retired from work. As a consequence, he and his wife could no longer meet their loan repayments, and the bank commenced enforcement action.
Was an easement that let one landowner park on a neighbour’s land valid? Which case won?
Two landowners owned neighbouring harbourside properties (Property A and Property B) in the eastern suburbs of Sydney. The properties were at the back of a larger block and were both accessed from the street by way of a long, narrow driveway. At the end of the driveway there was a wider area belonging to Property A on which two garages had been built side-by-side, a single garage and a double garage.
In 1990, an easement was granted in favour of Property B over an area approximately 3m x 16m in size, which comprised the single garage and the area immediately in front of it (“the easement area”).
An easement is a legal right to use someone else’s land for a specific limited purpose, most commonly in the form of a right of way or for services such as water or sewerage.
Could a landlord recover rent and lease incentives after the tenant abandoned the premises? Which case won?
A law firm was negotiating with a landlord for the lease of office premises in the inner Brisbane suburb of Bowen Hills, in Queensland. In November 2010, the parties agreed a deal and the terms were recorded in two documents:
- A standard form lease for a term of seven years, with three options to renew. Rent was to be paid monthly and a signage fee was to be paid annually; and
- An incentive deed, by which the landlord offered several incentives to the law firm to secure the deal, including a contribution to the fit out of the offices and a three-year reduction in the rent and signage fees payable under the lease.