“Our business was forced to close to make way for the highway, so we deserve compensation.” Which case won?
In 2016, Roads and Maritime Services of New South Wales compulsorily acquired a block of land to upgrade the Pacific Highway.
The landowner accepted an offer of $3,114,540 as compensation from RMS for the compulsory acquisition of land. This sum was determined by the Valuer-General and comprised $2,950,000 for the market value of the land and $164,540 for disturbance to the business.
“I should get workers comp back pay, starting from the day of my injury.” Which case won?
In September 2000, a worker fell while pushing a wheelbarrow in the course of his employment.
He suffered significant injuries to his leg and made a workers compensation claim.
The employer’s insurer accepted liability. It paid the worker’s treatment expenses and ongoing weekly benefits, along with a lump sum payment for permanent injury.
In June 2012, the worker fell when his leg gave way, breaking his wrist and significantly injuring his back. Under workers compensation law, these injuries were treated as being part of the initial work injury.
Should a permanently injured worker lose payments while waiting for assessment? Which case won?
The initial injury happened in December 2000, when the worker fell while pushing a wheelbarrow. He suffered a significant injury to his right leg and ankle. The workers compensation insurer accepted liability and paid treatment expenses and ongoing weekly benefits from that point on, as well as a lump sum payment for permanent injury about four years after the incident.
The leg injury continued to give the man problems. In 2012 he had a serious fall when the injured leg gave way, resulting in a broken wrist and a significant back injury. Under workers compensation law, these consequential further injuries are treated as being part of the initial work injury.
The insurer continued paying weekly benefits on the basis that the man was unable to work as a result of the injuries and made a formal decision in 2013 that he had “no work capacity”, meaning that he would continue to receive weekly compensation benefits into the future.
Compulsory acquisition of properties in NSW now not so certain
Government compulsorily acquires land for new road – was the land owner properly compensated? Which case won?
The Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW had compulsorily acquired part of a rural property to provide for a new section of the Pacific Highway, therefore entitling the property owners to compensation under section 37 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (NSW) (“the Just Terms Act”).
On the acquired land, the owners operated a cattle stud farm, including facilities for insemination/embryo transfer and a dairy bails/show complex, while their residence was located on the remaining land.
The new highway extension meant that there would be a higher speed limit for traffic passing by the residence and that the new road would be wider, more elevated and 35 metres closer to the residence than it had previously been.