Failure to specify currency can be deceptive conduct and a $15 million fine
Brother sues sister who pocketed 100% of their dad’s superannuation fund – which case won?
A case heard in the NSW Supreme Court concerned a battle between two siblings over a self-managed superannuation fund which had been established by their late father.
When the father died, the fund had approximately $1 million in assets. In his will, the father left his estate to be divided equally between his two children, who were an adult daughter and a young son.
The father’s will appointed his adult daughter the sole executor of his estate, as his son was too young to be a co-executor.
Who owns images on social media?
Can I claim copyright if I write a novel or research paper using generative AI?
How an emoji can land you in court
Australian victim of identity theft receives US$1.2 million damages bill from US court
Was it misleading and deceptive conduct, or simply ambush marketing? Which case won?
Ambush marketing is the practice by which a company attempts to associate its products or services with an event without paying to become an official sponsor of that event. Businesses sometimes do this as a way to get more customers while at the same time saving money on the cost of sponsorship.
This happened in 2016 when telco giant Telstra decided to associate itself with the Rio Olympic Games, presumably for the obvious marketing benefits of being linked to a universally popular and widely televised sporting event. Another factor in Telstra’s decision to take this course of action could have been that its arch-rival, Optus, was an official sponsor of the Olympic Games.