“I deserve more of the marital assets because I bought the house and now I look after the children.” Which case won?
A case in the Family Court involved a dispute over the division of marital assets.
The husband was aged 39, the wife was aged 37 and they had been married for about ten years at the time of separating. They had two children.
When they started living together, the husband had assets of a total value of $226,000, while the wife had assets of a total value of $11,500.
The husband was employed at all times and the wife was employed until shortly before the first child was born, then employed part-time after the first child turned five.
You’ve had a windfall and won lotto! To keep it you’d best get expert advice
Could an ex-husband claim a share in his ex-wife’s lottery win? Which case won?
A couple had been married for 20 years at the time of separation in July 2008. They had two adult children and owned real estate together.
In early 2009, six months after they had separated and while they were still negotiating the terms of the property settlement between them, the wife purchased a lottery ticket and won $6 million.
The husband contended that as the wife had purchased the lottery ticket with “joint funds”, he had therefore contributed to the winnings and they should be considered a joint asset of the marriage. The husband sought 50% of his ex-wife’s lottery winnings.
The wife disagreed, and the matter came before the Family Court for a determination on this and other matters that were in dispute between the couple.
Were they in a de facto relationship at the time of the IVF conception? Which case won?
A case heard in the Family Court centred on a dispute between two women who were in a same-sex relationship and had a child through IVF.
The women commenced a de facto relationship in 2004, sharing a residence for the following seven years.
In July 2011, one of the women underwent a successful IVF procedure. The donor of the egg for this procedure was the other woman.
However, the relationship was a tumultuous one. On 21 March 2011, prior to the IVF procedure, the woman who was to be the donor moved out of the residence that the women had shared.