When does an email exchange turn into a binding contract? Which case won?
A case heard in the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Western Australia concerned a dispute between a landlord and a tenant of commercial premises in Perth over whether their email exchange constituted a binding contract.
The tenant had occupied the premises for six years and its lease was due to expire on 30 June 2009. In May 2009, the parties began negotiations for a new lease.
Contesting a will in NSW – the horror story edition
Bad short-term renters and hosts in NSW can now go on Exclusion Register
The law on trees blocking the sun
How do you deal with an intestate estate? Contesting an estate without a will
Who has to pay for repairs? The landlord or the tenant?
Should the owner of a landlocked property be able to access it by vehicle? Which case won?
This case concerned a property in south-western Sydney. The property was landlocked by three neighbouring houses to the south/east and by a council reserve to the north/west. Behind the council reserve was a footpath that ran along a river and was used by the public as a walking track.
For many years, the property had been owned by the Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA), which had plans to build a road along the river. However, the road was never built and the RTA eventually sold the land to a private buyer.